TOO MUCH EDUCATION IS DANGEROUS. IF PEOPLE RECEIVE MORE EDUCATION THAN THEY NEED TO FUNCTION THEIR JOB, IT ONLY BREEDS DISSATISFACTION.

Some people may say that education gives people unrealistic ambition; the law of the market decrees (keputusan) that not everyone can be managing director. In fact for every boss there must be many employees, so some country believe there is very little point (no use) in training people for a level of job that they can never hope to achieve. What is more, education is expensive. Therefore over-education is waste of time and money. Another argument against education would be that students tend to be disruptive influence on soceity. Once you encourage people to think for themselves it is difficult to control what they are thinking. It is hardly surprising that students are often found at the forefront of radical organizations.
In spite of the problems of over-education, most countries need a high standard of human resources in order to compete in the word market. Constantly changing technology means that the work force has to be flexible and receptive to new ideas in order to be of value to employees. When a person is only trained to perform one job, it is not realistic to expecthim or her to adapt to a change in circumstances or unexpected problem. All this is not to mention the moral questions involved in limiting education. Who has the right to say how much education a person is entitled to? What criteria culd be used to decide a level of schooling?
It may be true that a greater level of education tends to make people more radical. However, if soceity is not going to become static, it must be prepared to accept new ideas. Therefore degree of radicalism caused by a high level of education can only serve to make the country more adaptable and better able to with stand social change in the long run.